Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 08:10:00 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Martin Husemann <martin@rumolt.teuto.de>, Anderl <gax43544@icn.siemens.de>, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i4b and uucp Message-ID: <19981118081000.A1395@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <000401be1167$e6577eb0$53cb08d4@hwart.teuto.de>; from Martin Husemann on Mon, Nov 16, 1998 at 02:49:15PM %2B0100 References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.981116122015.776I-100000@koerk> <000401be1167$e6577eb0$53cb08d4@hwart.teuto.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 16, 1998 at 02:49:15PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > is there a way to handle native uucp via i4b? uucp over tcp/ip is likely
> > to work, isn't it?
>
> Which protocol stack do you mean by 'native' uucp?
>
> If you are thinking of V.110/V.120: no.
>
> If you have control over both sides, or the remote side already offers raw
> ISDN access to a tty port running uucico, you could try using the raw b
> channel (rbch) driver.
>
> I guess the real small benefit from slightly less protocol overhead will not
> be worth the trouble.
Right ... using the e-protocol for example gives you enough throughput.
/etc/uucp/sys:
system easix
port type tcp
chat-timeout 10
protocol eitGg
chat ogin: \L word: \P
address easix.gun.de
alternate
port port1
chat-timeout 60
protocol eGg
chat "" \d\d\r name> \d\L word> \d\P ogin: \L\n\c word: \P\n\c
phone 02131791100
BTW, here an analogue modem backup link ;-)
--
Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ?
http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html
"NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP''
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981118081000.A1395>