From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 10 21:06:26 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3086316A41C;
	Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:06:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA97543D48;
	Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:06:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CBE85137B3; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:06:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200507090145.00506.lofi@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0507102305550.12397@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0507082349240.14905@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
	<Pine.BSF.4.62.0507090003340.14905@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
	<1120861640.91809.15.camel@hood.oook.cz>
	<200507090145.00506.lofi@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: pav@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: lang/gcc33: snapshots -> final release
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:06:26 -0000

On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> I really wonder why everybody is so afraid of PORTEPOCH and tries to 
> work around it even in cases where it's clearly the best thing to use 
> (like here). :-)

In this case I really bit the bullet know and made this change.

Gerald