Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:11:21 +1100 From: "Dewayne Geraghty" <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> To: "'Cy Schubert'" <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, <magik@roorback.net>, <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: security/openssh-portable Message-ID: <E3C3C1EDE5AB47D88168C39A08486E5F@white> In-Reply-To: <201203140757.q2E7vk8L071546@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201203140757.q2E7vk8L071546@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy, If the option of splitting openssh into two ports means that one of those ports is closer to the base system's openssh, and the base system's openssh requires the FreeBSD patch-set, for base, then this is a commendable suggestion. Otherwise, I would vote for one kit, subject of course to Grzegorz' nod. Like Mel, I enjoy the benefit of HPN and keys only. Kind regards, Dewayne.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E3C3C1EDE5AB47D88168C39A08486E5F>