From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 14:39:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B387F16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:39:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E94D43D49 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:39:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:198:210:4bff:fe3d:e256]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4107366DE; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:39:03 +0200 From: Miguel Mendez To: "ALeine" Message-Id: <20050330163903.6bd36f46.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <200503301355.j2UDtHrV005944@marlena.vvi.at> References: <200503301355.j2UDtHrV005944@marlena.vvi.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.5 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__30_Mar_2005_16_39_03_+0200_/CLUuiykr5IJvPOa" cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A bunch of memory allocation bugs in CGD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:39:36 -0000 --Signature=_Wed__30_Mar_2005_16_39_03_+0200_/CLUuiykr5IJvPOa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:55:17 -0800 (PST) "ALeine" wrote: [Trollish CC trimmed.] > I find it alarming that this kind of sloppy programming can be found in > a piece of software that is supposedly designed to be secure and provide > security. I believe the CGD code should be seriously audited before > anyone considers using it in a production environment. This has nothing to do with FreeBSD development, take it elsewhere. What's your intention, start another flamefest like the endless CGD vs GBDE thread? Please. If you've found flaws in CGD contact the NetBSD developers and send patches or shut up (TM). Cheers, --=20 Miguel Mendez http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 --Signature=_Wed__30_Mar_2005_16_39_03_+0200_/CLUuiykr5IJvPOa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCSroOnLctrNyFFPERAq52AJ9fc8R2YW4Myh6Skee0MckkrqMIdgCdHpY9 izYin/wk/lYMiVksj6cdDCM= =FunC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__30_Mar_2005_16_39_03_+0200_/CLUuiykr5IJvPOa--