Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:56:06 -0000
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>
Cc:        Diane Bruce <db@db.net>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>, Bruce Evans <bde@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>, David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject:   Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148
Message-ID:  <20120717043848.GB87001@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Resent-Message-ID: <20120812225559.GF20453@server.rulingia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120717042125.GF66913@server.rulingia.com>
References:  <201207130818.38535.jhb@freebsd.org> <9EB2DA4F-19D7-4BA5-8811-D9451CB1D907@theravensnest.org> <C527B388-3537-406F-BA6D-2FA45B9EAA3B@FreeBSD.org> <20120713155805.GC81965@zim.MIT.EDU> <20120714120432.GA70706@server.rulingia.com> <20120717084457.U3890@besplex.bde.org> <5004A5C7.1040405@missouri.edu> <5004DEA9.1050001@missouri.edu> <20120717040118.GA86840@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120717042125.GF66913@server.rulingia.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:21:25PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Jul-16 21:01:18 -0700, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:40:25PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >> 
> >> I came up with pseudo code that looks a bit like this.
> ...
> >Stop.  Please see msun/src/math_private.h. You cannot
> >use I in any expression.
> 
> Note the "pseudo code" reference.  I agree that the actual code has to
> jump through hoops to avoid compiler issues with complex arithmetic
> but doing that for pseudocode just obfuscates it.
> 
> >Also, consult n1256.pdf for x,y = +-0, +-inf, nan. 
> >There are specific requirements that must be met.
> 
> Again, handling the special cases listed in G.6 is all just
> boilerplate code that we can take as assumed for pseudocode.  IMO, it
> would be nice if we could come up with a formal, compact (one/line per
> rule) representation of G.6 that could be pre-processed into wrapper
> code that handles all the 0/Inf/NaN special-cases and then calls
> FOO_finite() which has the hand-written code to handle "normal" cases.
> 

As someone who spent 10+ years getting sqrtl(), cbrtl(), ccosh(), sinl(),
cosl(), tanl(), etc into FreeBSD, I respectfully disagree with your
take that it is just boilerplate.  Getting this stuff right is much harder
than I think some people understand.  Oh well, I'll back to lurking and
working on things I need.
 
-- 
Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120717043848.GB87001>