From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Oct 11 18:48:18 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA27313
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 18:48:18 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA27294
          ; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 18:48:14 -0700
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA00301; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 18:47:15 -0700
Message-Id: <199510120147.SAA00301@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>
cc: Pete Delaney <pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org,
        ports@FreeBSD.org, netbsd-ports@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 - Port of HotJava to FreeBSD and NetBSD More 
 Usefull? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Oct 1995 17:53:26 PDT."
             <Pine.AUX.3.91.951011175038.22780A-100000@covina.lightside.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 18:47:09 -0700
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> Jake Hamby said:

 > 
 > I heard there was some fairly good progress being made on a Linux port.
 > Is this true?  Because if the Linux people have a working version, then a
 > FreeBSD/NetBSD version would be almost trivial from there.
 > 

Thats right people are still porting Java 8)

	Amancio