From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 18:25:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EBA1065670 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 18:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tl32@next.online.no) Received: from mail49.e.nsc.no (mail49.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D528FC12 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 18:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tl32@next.online.no) Received: from [84.202.100.237] (084202100237.customer.alfanett.no [84.202.100.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail49.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m4QIP7Ah025868 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 20:25:07 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <483B009E.5000808@next.online.no> Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 20:25:34 +0200 From: Tore Lund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080229) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <483ADEA1.40206@webrz.net> <483AE57B.2000106@magichamster.com> <483AEB21.4070100@webrz.net> <483AF28F.1080102@magichamster.com> <18490.64855.333616.875277@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18490.64855.333616.875277@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Kernel for Dual Core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 18:25:10 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > And, _anecdotally_, smaller kernels are faster. Right, anecdotally. I seem to recall there was a real speed gain under version 4.x. When I tried to trim my kernel in one of the 6.x releases, however, there was barely any difference. -- Tore