From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 01:54:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE201065672; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B26F8FC08; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (c-67-180-24-15.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.24.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1H1sQtv016431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:54:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4F3DB3AE.5000109@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:55:58 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/3.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4F3C2671.3090808__7697.00510795719$1329343207$gmane$org@freebsd.org> <4F3D3E2D.9090100@FreeBSD.org> <4F3D6FDD.9050808@freebsd.org> <4F3D89CD.9050309@freebsd.org> <4F3DA27A.3090903@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F3DA27A.3090903@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Kabaev , threads@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable , David Xu Subject: Re: pthread_cond_timedwait() broken in 9-stable? [possible answer] X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:54:28 -0000 kern.timecounter.tick: 1 kern.timecounter.choice: TSC-low(1000) i8254(0) HPET(950) ACPI-fast(900) dummy(-1000000) kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0 switching the machine from TSC_low to ACPI-fast fixes the problem. in 8.x it used to default to ACPI but I used to switch it to "TSC" to get better performance. I wonder why TSC-low is now bad to use.. maybe the TSCs are not as well sychronised as they were in 8.x? maybe the pthreads code didn't get the memo about changing timers?