From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 26 19:41:36 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6CB106564A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mva@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (smtprelay05.ispgateway.de
	[80.67.31.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65888FC0A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [89.182.27.31] (helo=localhost)
	by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <mva@FreeBSD.org>) id 1Sjbd8-00036y-TK
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:40:55 +0200
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:43:11 +0200
From: Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20120626194311.GG2540@medusa.sysfault.org>
References: <4FE8E4A4.9070507@gmail.com>
	<20120626065732.GH41054@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<20120626092645.Horde.HytQbVNNcXdP6WQ1aMtjoMA@webmail.df.eu>
	<4FE96BA0.6040005@infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<20120626103400.Horde.8frYBVNNcXdP6XP4ZP-0deA@webmail.df.eu>
	<20120626084433.GJ41054@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<CADLFttdQ3RwhrB3Sk0UjbtT4EPW4wztPOak9KQLwR7GNyY8GZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120626185048.GC2540@medusa.sysfault.org>
	<op.wgixxb1m34t2sn@tech304>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JkW1gnuWHDypiMFO"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <op.wgixxb1m34t2sn@tech304>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Df-Sender: MzIwMDk1
Subject: Re: Port system "problems"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:41:36 -0000


--JkW1gnuWHDypiMFO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On, Tue Jun 26, 2012, Mark Felder wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:50:48 -0500, Marcus von Appen <mva@freebsd.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I still do not see any reason or argument on why we would need
> > sub-packages.
>
> I want up to date packages for all my servers. My servers all have
> different requirements -- I want Apache with LDAP here, and definitely
> Apache without LDAP there. Designing a package-building and deployment
> system for a non-homogenous server farm is an exercise in futility. Having
> proper sub-packages fixes this issue in a cleanly supportable fashion.

That sound good to me and something I'd vote for, since it does not
split ports on a technical, but functional level into packages.

Cheers
Marcus

--JkW1gnuWHDypiMFO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/qEM8ACgkQi68/ErJnpkeHXwCgvRH5XUJk/nMk1m4md/Ma8WVl
TwYAoMDSPuP+0hOQ5LZkJPEJRhe5aX/r
=Daoa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JkW1gnuWHDypiMFO--