From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 8 10:20:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dopey.corp.expertcity.com (host1.expertcity.rangefire.net [216.64.159.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDB737B406 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:20:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff@expertcity.com) Received: by dopey.corp.expertcity.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:21:21 -0700 Message-ID: <0307F3737A2AD511A42200D0B7A071919A4043@dopey.corp.expertcity.com> From: Jeff Behl To: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: timing question Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:21:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG thanks to all for the help with the timing question. Increasing the hz to 400 (in param.c) allowed for granularity of 5ms, which is what we needed. For those as unknowing as I was about unix timing, I ran across the following url which explained why a setting of 400hz allows for a max resolution of twice the tick amount (2.5ms).: http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/ttm/Notes/PAM2001/node6.html#SECTIO N00061000000000000000 jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message