From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 21 7:35:48 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7D537B401; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:35:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C18443FAF; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:35:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.8/8.12.8/Sunbay) with ESMTP id h2LFZM0J016104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:35:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h2LFZM34016103; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:35:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:35:22 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Yar Tikhiy Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build options for kernel modules Message-ID: <20030321153522.GD15185@sunbay.com> References: <20030321153217.GA53518@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GxcwvYAGnODwn7V8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030321153217.GA53518@comp.chem.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --GxcwvYAGnODwn7V8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief > answer from someone who has the information. >=20 > As far as I can see, kernel modules should be built along with the > kernel for the only reason of keeping their mutual interfaces in > sync, has a source file defining such an interface changed. Is > there currently no way to go further and affect a kernel module's > built-in features with kernel config file options, besides modifying > makefiles in /sys/modules? >=20 There is. It's called ``makeoptions''. It's passed to both kernel and modules builds. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --GxcwvYAGnODwn7V8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+ezE6Ukv4P6juNwoRAp+rAJ9VDor4fjSPT7BTOyMyFSXW5c2qzACggOEk yuXajneqZ0ugZu1Exl1fRyQ= =GjTa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GxcwvYAGnODwn7V8-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message