From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 08:50:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C7D16A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 08:50:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from lon-mail-3.gradwell.net (lon-mail-3.gradwell.net [193.111.201.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CF743D53 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 08:50:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from 82-39-75-228.cable.ubr02.jarr.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.39.75.228] helo=webmaker@asgard.uk) by lon-mail-3.gradwell.net with esmtp (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.184) id 42a40c50.18274.2aa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:41:52 +0100 (envelope-sender ) From: dgmm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:41:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <42A3721D.9060602@hacked.com.br> In-Reply-To: <42A3721D.9060602@hacked.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506060941.50709.freebsd01@dgmm.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Co-location X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:50:17 -0000 On Sunday 05 June 2005 22:43, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote: > I'm looking for FreeBSD co-located servers on united states or any other > country that have good internet connections, for a secondary backup of > data and web host for the company I work to, sorry for this OT message, > but could any of you send me good sites where i can find this? Is > difficult to judge well too outside of this market. Have you considered the implications of storing data out of country? There may be laws relating to your data and what you can do with it either local to you or local to where you store it. Depending on the data, it may be a non-issue, but I know of at least one company who's been bitten by this. -- Dave