From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Apr 30 17:41:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (unknown [209.198.197.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE84114CE7 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obonilla@voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu) Received: (from obonilla@localhost) by voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA01367; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 18:38:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from obonilla) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 18:38:53 -0600 From: Oscar Bonilla To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports freeze 5/10 Message-ID: <19990430183853.D628@fisicc-ufm.edu> References: <199905010007.RAA22705@bubble.didi.com> <372A4B2D.8EBA8B6A@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <372A4B2D.8EBA8B6A@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>; from Pedro F. Giffuni on Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 07:30:38PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 07:30:38PM -0500, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > FWIW, > I took a brief look at the freeWAIS-sf port, since I updated it. The > problem seems to be that the "answer script" expect a /usr/local/ > directory, that is it doesn't respect PREFIX. > The solution is worse than the problem: nuke the script and make the port > interactive :( > maybe i'm just being silly considering i've never even touched freeWAIS-fs, but isn't it simpler to make answer respect prefix? regards, -Oscar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message