From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 26 08:55:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D720A106566C for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953D48FC17 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CYiD1g0010bG4ec5CYiDZx; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:42:13 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([98.248.33.18]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CYiB1g0090PUQVN3PYiBvG; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:42:12 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0AF279B422; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:42:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:42:10 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Tim Kientzle Message-ID: <20110226084210.GA24248@icarus.home.lan> References: <8CDA335A0CABF7E-338-9FC4@web-mmc-d05.sysops.aol.com> <317BD8618FA7450ABC86001948F4DFE4@multiplay.co.uk> <98FE1AB5-5276-4B12-A034-106330EBB713@kientzle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <98FE1AB5-5276-4B12-A034-106330EBB713@kientzle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:38:06 +0000 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers , Steven Hartland Subject: Re: quotas an essential feature? (was: svn commit: r218953 - stable/8/usr.sbin/sysinstall) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:55:27 -0000 On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:25:00PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > On Feb 25, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: > > > While I can understand some may want its not something we use on any of > > our machines, and I suspect that's the case for many others. > > > > Given adding it means the kernel will be doing extra work and hence a > > drop in performance... > > Does anyone have benchmark results to measure the performance hit? I imagine there wouldn't be any (or extremely negligible) unless you used quotaon(8). -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |