Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:42:10 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> To: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Subject: Re: quotas an essential feature? (was: svn commit: r218953 - stable/8/usr.sbin/sysinstall) Message-ID: <20110226084210.GA24248@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <98FE1AB5-5276-4B12-A034-106330EBB713@kientzle.com> References: <8CDA335A0CABF7E-338-9FC4@web-mmc-d05.sysops.aol.com> <317BD8618FA7450ABC86001948F4DFE4@multiplay.co.uk> <98FE1AB5-5276-4B12-A034-106330EBB713@kientzle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:25:00PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > On Feb 25, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: > > > While I can understand some may want its not something we use on any of > > our machines, and I suspect that's the case for many others. > > > > Given adding it means the kernel will be doing extra work and hence a > > drop in performance... > > Does anyone have benchmark results to measure the performance hit? I imagine there wouldn't be any (or extremely negligible) unless you used quotaon(8). -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110226084210.GA24248>