From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Feb 20 15:55:49 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C29C37B401; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:55:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E6C43FAF; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:55:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16025A804; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:55:45 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F025425; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:55:45 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:55:45 +1100 (EST) From: Andrew To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/42312: make release broken without full ports In-Reply-To: <200302200506.h1K56oOY058790@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20030221104841.V93921-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > Is it OK if I close this? I think it's something that can (should) > be worked around by making sure that a release gets built with a > ports tree with a tag that's consistent with the release being built > (as described in my first followup). Sorry I missed your original follow up. The machine has been happily building 4.7 releases with ports from HEAD so I'm happy for the problem to be closed. Thanks, Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message