From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Apr 30 17:53:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (bachue.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9919314DB0 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:53:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.44]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with ESMTP id AAA12697; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:52:44 -0400 Message-ID: <372A50C4.DBB68A3C@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:54:29 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [es] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: es,en-US,it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oscar Bonilla Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports freeze 5/10 References: <199905010007.RAA22705@bubble.didi.com> <372A4B2D.8EBA8B6A@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> <19990430183853.D628@fisicc-ufm.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org No. But please prove me wrong :) Pedro. Oscar Bonilla escribió: > On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 07:30:38PM -0500, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > FWIW, > > I took a brief look at the freeWAIS-sf port, since I updated it. The > > problem seems to be that the "answer script" expect a /usr/local/ > > directory, that is it doesn't respect PREFIX. > > The solution is worse than the problem: nuke the script and make the port > > interactive :( > > > maybe i'm just being silly considering i've never even touched freeWAIS-fs, > but isn't it simpler to make answer respect prefix? > > regards, > > -Oscar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message