From owner-freebsd-security Wed Mar 10 15:55:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from fep02-svc.tin.it (mta02-acc.tin.it [212.216.176.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCB714F0A for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:54:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from molter@tin.it) Received: from nympha.ecomotor.it ([212.216.29.188]) by fep02-svc.tin.it (InterMail v4.0 201-221-105) with SMTP id <19990310235428.HYSU4663.fep02-svc@nympha.ecomotor.it> for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:54:28 +0100 Received: (qmail 7151 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Mar 1999 23:50:08 -0000 From: "Marco Molteni" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:50:07 +0100 (CET) X-Sender: molter@nympha To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Janos Mohacsi wrote: [..] > An other point OpenBSD made some steps forward: they have IPSec (PF_KEY > v2 !!). 1. PF_KEY != IPsec. 2. Anyway, FreeBSD has IPsec too. Go get KAME IPv6/IPsec at www.kame.net. FreeBSD IPsec will become a merge of KAME, NRL, INRIA. 3. disappointed about FreeBSD security architecture? Fix it. [..] Marco --- "Hi, I have a Compaq machine running Windows 95. How do I install FreeBSD?" "I'm sorry, this is device driver testing: brain implants are two doors down on the right". (Bill Paul, on the freebsd-net mailing list) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message