From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 11 16:31:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F37B1065672 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:31:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D9C8FC0A for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E389D8FC2B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:31:56 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5ACA18FC1D; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:31:56 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F27843981A; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:32:03 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:31:59 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-Id: <20090411203159.25fd4c48.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49E0AB5D.60403@p6m7g8.com> References: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com> <49DFCAEB.60505@p6m7g8.com> <20090411113216.24170d6f.stas@FreeBSD.org> <49E0AB5D.60403@p6m7g8.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Apr 11 20:31:56 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49e0c5fc967001346518677 Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" , ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST implied by USE_RUBYGEMS=yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:31:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:38:21 -0400 "Philip M. Gollucci" mentioned: > > I don't think it is a good idead as historically we prefer static pkg-plists > > over dynamic ones. For ports where names of the files are perfectly known > > AUTOPLIST feature is not required. When I introduced this option my intention > > was to work around rdoc names generation problem and to not eliminate rubygem > > pkg-plists entirely. > *sigh*. > > Wouldn't every rubygem port have to use it to work around that issue > (the zfs one?)? Nope, as not all gem ports contain auto-generated rdoc files. > > That means every rubygem should fail in QAT then b/c of the NOPORTDOCS > .... he must be excluding them. > Well, as I said before I like the idea of automatic handle of NOPORTDOCS key. Often, docs included are just static files with known names, and in this case AUTOPLIST feature is not needed. Otherwise, the port can use AUTOPLIST feature. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkngxgMACgkQK/VZk+smlYHlgQCffRvPSYjYDFU5LRr3LiYunC2E sHIAn23DUOgquFzhQpTRlUhLGT9rBhvM =8scD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49e0c5fc967001346518677!