From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 15 13:41:01 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A01564E
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org)
Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D075AED
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:41:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 64416 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2013 14:53:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [62.48.0.94]) ([62.48.0.94])
 (envelope-sender <andre@freebsd.org>)
 by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; 15 Mar 2013 14:53:01 -0000
Message-ID: <514324E8.30209@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:40:56 +0100
From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: NewNFS vs. oldNFS for 10.0?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rmacklem@uoguelph.ca
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:41:01 -0000

Hi Rick, all,

is there a plan to decide for one NFS implementation for FreeBSD 10.0,
or to keep both around indefinately?

I'm talking about:
  oldNFS in sys/{nfs, nfsclient, nfsserver}     NFSv2+NFSv3
  newNFS in sys/fs/{nfs, nfsclient, nfsserver}  NFSv2+NFSv3+NFSv4

NewNFS supports newer NFS standards and seems to have proven itself in
some quite heavy traffic environments.

Is there any reason to keep oldNFS around other than nostalgic?

-- 
Andre