From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 22:21:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2527985; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3EA23CEAA; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 23:21:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E60473.20306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:21:39 +0100 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Andrews Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? References: <50E1D012.1040004@missouri.edu> <20121231175808.GA1399@glenbarber.us> <6817fb4c15659b194cc658b1dfa58a31.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <148920333.20121231235441@takeda.tk> <50E3444D.1060307@mu.org> <6794891ed487f426d2c5d0108648f1e0.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20130102123148.1f493d00@X220.ovitrap.com> <50E45A03.9080600@FreeBSD.org> <20130103075037.130afa18@X220.ovitrap.com> <50E533F1.5020006@FreeBSD.org> <50E5A7D1.4080306@FreeBSD.org> <20130103221546.F094B2D94395@drugs.dv.isc.org> In-Reply-To: <20130103221546.F094B2D94395@drugs.dv.isc.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Andree List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:21:40 -0000 Am 03.01.2013 23:15, schrieb Mark Andrews: > In message <50E5A7D1.4080306@FreeBSD.org>, Matthias Andree writes: >> Am 03.01.2013 16:36, schrieb Eitan Adler: >>> On 3 January 2013 02:32, Matthias Andree wrote: >>>> Please do not quote addresses. Not all web archives and copies hide >>>> them properly. >>> >>> Hiding email addresses is useless for spam control. Obfuscating them >>> makes it harder to follow a conversation. >> >> Anyways it's useless baggage in the presence of real names. > > Garbage. Real names are *not* unique. Email address are disambiguators. No need to disambiguate text if the headers convey all necessary information. Let's take this part off-list now, reply-to: is set.