Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:26:13 -0800 From: Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Getting flash working with Firefox Message-ID: <41CE4B75.3070008@0lsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200412230037.iBN0bF9n021470@sakura.ninth-nine.com> References: <20041222084249.GA76803@0lsen.net> <41C9CAFB.5090308@glengroup.com> <200412230037.iBN0bF9n021470@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Not to sound ungrateful, but why does one have to do all this gobbledy gook in order to get flash working? After reading the port and this stuff, I still don't know what in the heck to do. I thought the point of the ports system is to make this stuff easier not bake cookies. -Clint Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hum.. This document is too old. Because, as it is now, > > 1. '2. add WITH_LIBMAP=yes to /etc/make.conf' > It inspects whether linuxpluginwrapper port needs to update > rtld. So please follow port's message. > > 2. '4. cd /usr/ports/devel/linuxthreads && make install clean' > No more linuxthreads. > > 3. '6. edit the Makefile and comment out the following 3 lines:' > Please define WITHOUT_PLUGINS macro if you need. > > 4. '8. create a libmap.conf in /etc and add the following to it' > SEE ALSO: sample of libmap.conf in exampledir. Please look at > `pkg_info -D linuxpluginwrapper-\*' for details. > > 5. '9. now restart X (I'm not positive this is necessary, but the howto said so, so I figured it was)' > I think no need. But, as possible as, restart browser. > > What can be said in all is already included in linuxpluginwrapper > port:-). Is still document required? I don't think so, but > if flash6(or flash7) is used by native browsers, it advertize > that there is installation necessity about linuxpluginwrapper.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41CE4B75.3070008>