From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 20:54:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD23910656AE for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from if@xip.at) Received: from chile.gbit.at (ns1.xip.at [193.239.188.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207278FC15 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18420 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 22:54:13 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO filebunker.xip.at) (86.59.10.180) by chile.gbit.at with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 22:54:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:54:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Flaschberger To: "Li, Qing" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Qing Li , net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: funny ECMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:54:15 -0000 Dear Li, >> I hoped, that now, as freebsd has multi-route support (as other unix >> really have for a long long time) everything would be easier. >> >> But multipath support of freebsd is in my opinion, in a "experimental" >> state. >> > > Yes, agreed. > > It will be in the experimental state until there is varied > and sufficient usage. > > So now I will make improvement to the implementation based on your > usage scenario and feedback. Currently I also try to write code for this. I can send you later the code. Kind regards, Ingo Flaschberger