From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jun  9 17:50:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA25540
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 17:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA25527
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 17:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1)
	id 0wbF8i-0000O3-00; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 18:50:24 -0600
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Subject: Re: overclocking 
Cc: burton@bsampley.vip.best.com, current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Jun 1997 15:22:58 PDT."
		<199706092222.PAA01036@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> 
References: <199706092222.PAA01036@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>  
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 1997 18:50:24 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0wbF8i-0000O3-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199706092222.PAA01036@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> Satoshi Asami writes:
: However, I suggest you invest some money on SCSI drives before you
: even try overclocking.  (Get the 8ms/7,200rpm variants too --
: 10ms/5,400rpm won't do much better.)  The bottleneck of your machine
: during compilation should be the disks, not the CPU.

P.S.  And about a 5-10% improvement for overclocking the PPro 180 to
200.

Warner