From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 21 20:43:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D18D777
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:43:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22d.google.com (mail-vc0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AE36EE
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:43:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id le20so3615564vcb.32
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=/ZCPVC5m6TI+H/Wxi+DWL2toL9qfIZDl2CMjYhOVAtg=;
 b=refif8tfSNW45CtrGj+0oF+SbMNjuhzyoSKCr6y4ah6kZWYuIY7FG+5QhU2Kxt0YG/
 3ACu11MMO5KqFc7BhfMmQhMUeN5/E7I3HHfYKGYc1gs99hHaAmR8IeAGGwlk7j54FlOh
 IbWvluj8UByI2YLU0+3Kb/D3xUvFvtV9Dj9N7nKLI1j/9ajWqsvYPJZZBeCSTjNC724n
 xtFHPvzdwbeVLpaqsqjlIj6ieX6eXmVRzf9tJy5ip4iv7gNRlc1RjanALYGEGLp9Jv+1
 18B5Rk4hOBP/iYrAh5YsDi8RJsv6GU/xb8Z0tkfLM8kNB3AFtPgsk5Bth5ibr5o1R+Be
 daIA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.251.200 with SMTP id mt8mr7497133vcb.24.1411332231198;
 Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.22.130 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140921203410.GM2210@kib.kiev.ua>
References: <CAJOqHmhpjuh5em+dr8Qpqu8fCsDnwC6_znSZYwc=XdM90OAVvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140921195943.GK2210@kib.kiev.ua>
 <CAJOqHmhAn=-0izzxTOmoAJDsnafTtUqO4niTxGNSM8H5S40wYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140921203410.GM2210@kib.kiev.ua>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:43:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJOqHmi71=-ofp0RUqbR=NinzQOjeF8puOFpNzrw3+G3c3dREw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: stack size rlimit
From: suresh gumpula <gsuryacse7k@gmail.com>
To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:09:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:43:52 -0000

Yes, we may not really need this big stack space for a process.  I am just
experimenting RLIMIT_INFINITY on BSD and linux.  On BSD  we are limiting to
kern.maxssiz it seems.
And the address map layout which described in the design book , is not what
we are doing as you said.

Thank you!

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:19:38PM -0400, suresh gumpula wrote:
> > Thank you ! .  So we cannot have the stack size beyond 512M  . correct ?
> You have to adjust kern.maxssiz to be able to bump RLIMIT_STACK beyond
> 512M (on amd64).
>
> Just curious, why do you need this ?
>
> >
> > % sudo ./test_stack
> > Current limit value is : 8M
> > max limit value is : 512M
> >
> > Changing the limits to infinity...
> >
> > Current limit  value now is : 512M
> > max limit value now is : 512M
>