From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 16 14:46:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA28352 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 14:46:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA28343 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 14:46:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0zfXPD-00026j-00; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 14:45:59 -0800 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 14:45:57 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Mike Holling cc: Wes Peters , Dj Browne , chad@DCFinc.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: D-Link DE620 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Mike Holling wrote: > > Is a direct-cable serial PPP link an option? At 115,200 bps, it's just > > about as fast as the parallel-port ethernet, if a little less convenient > > to setup. > > 115200 bits/sec -> 14400 bytes/sec -> 14 kilobytes/sec. The parallel > cable is definitely faster than the serial link. Remember, this is async serial, so it 10 bits per byte, not 8, so: 115200 / 10 = 11520 bytes/sec > - Mike Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message