From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 28 21:36:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EA116A4CE for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:36:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189D343D1D for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:36:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692405EF0; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:36:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79793-01; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:36:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-114-38.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.114.38]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C2B5EF2; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:36:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41FAB04E.9080606@mac.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:36:14 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael E.Conlen" References: <7dafe99c9578eecb24e826dc7226278b@obfuscated.net> In-Reply-To: <7dafe99c9578eecb24e826dc7226278b@obfuscated.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: pf and different MTUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:36:14 -0000 Michael E.Conlen wrote: > I'm using FreeBSD and PF as a firewall between two networks. I want to > change the MTU on one network to 9k but I have to leave the MTU on the > other network at 1500 bytes. Will the system handle the fragmenting for > me going from the larger MTU to the smaller? Sure. However, if you have a lot of traffic using jumbo frames going over that 1500 MTU segment, you might be better off using an MTU of 1500 everywhere. -- -Chuck