Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:13:02 -0500 From: Peter Steele <psteele@maxiscale.com> To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Puzzling stack trace Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AADF7@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> In-Reply-To: <201003260941.29154.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACBE@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <86iq8jl0d7.fsf@ds4.des.no> <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACDB@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> <201003260941.29154.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Also, you should see if=20 >__svfscanf() calls __srget(). The __svfscanf() call frame may not show up= in=20 >gdb if the compiler re-used the callframe from vsscanf for __svfscanf() as= an=20 >optimization. I just checked--it does not call __srget()...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AADF7>