From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 21 17:47:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B1E1065670; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:47:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmoll@darkthrone.kvedulv.de) Received: from darkthrone.kvedulv.de (darkthrone.kvedulv.de [IPv6:2001:1578:400:101::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DBB8FC0C; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by darkthrone.kvedulv.de (Postfix, from userid 666) id 433541CC6E; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:47:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:47:53 +0100 From: Michael Moll To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20110321174753.GB32285@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> References: <4D840BD0.4030306@freebsd.org> <201103200000.p2K00pue003373@chez.mckusick.com> <20110320162212.GI1606@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110320162212.GI1606@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, kvedulv@kvedulv.de, Jeff Roberson , Kirk McKusick , Gavin Atkinson , Nathan Whitehorn , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r219667 - head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:47:55 -0000 Hi All, On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:22:12PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > I fear it's still a bit premature for enable SU+J by default. Rather > recently I was told about a SU+J filesystems lost after a panic > that happend after snapshotting it (report CC'ed, maybe he can > provide some more details) and I'm pretty sure I've seen the problem > described in PR 149022 also after the potential fix mentioned in its > feedback. Sorry, no details available, as I didn't record the panic and problems back then. However this was not the first panic which I attribute (maybe wrongly) to SUJ and as an consequence now all my UFS filesystems have SUJ turned off again. If SUJ really is going to be the default I would expact quite some fallout from this after my experiences. Kind Regards -- Michael Moll