From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 29 21:09:49 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD90106564A;
	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:09:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com
	[209.85.161.44])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD018FC14;
	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:09:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so1404302fxe.17
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=OHK51Y9+QWQYn1tnVPuIyuV+zdAvjZoaM+IbJ+pYYNc=;
	b=xOX5EqG8wRMjpp8DGWJwl8TNZGXzdEAfproEW3Isd98+DHGmHwTVk9QHtZ4k4K1RmH
	JXAIGfRA9nALxDInPrPtNhd9hN+jSNQQArbif1K2rXfdnoP0Sox9t+6bnWVR6fKL9wK/
	FP9BZsEgloK329eDDhEgTyKJUllZ+LbNzskFQ=
Received: by 10.223.16.136 with SMTP id o8mr1836295faa.21.1309379775728;
	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from limbo.lan ([195.225.157.86])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q14sm1116343faa.3.2011.06.29.13.36.13
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E0B8CBC.8080601@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:36:12 +0300
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; uk-UA;
	rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110622 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: obrien@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly
	experimental"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:09:50 -0000

23.06.2011 19:31, David O'Brien wrote:
> Does anyone object to this patch?
>
> David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two
> years with no problems.
>
> I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on
> TMPFS either.
>

Maybe i'm missing something but creating/removing large number of files 
in one directory on tmpfs was very slow for me. That was long ago and 
ZFS was in so i'll try to retest...

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.