From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 12 00:22:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA14000 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 00:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA13993 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 00:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA10677; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 08:17:34 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199706120717.IAA10677@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Mark Tinguely cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Ari Suutari Subject: Re: /var/run/natd.pid request In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Jun 1997 12:20:40 CDT." <199706111720.MAA17995@plains.NoDak.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 08:17:34 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I finally figured out how to get natd working, and I have a little > suggestion: stuff the natd PID in /var/run/natd.pid. from my experiments > when the translating interface's address is dynamic (and using -dynamic > option), the natd process requires a SIGHUP to make the change to the > new address. If the natd PID is available, then it will simply the process. I've cc'd this to Ari Suutari (the author). I don't have any problem with this idea. I did however think that the address change was transparent (reading the routing socket), but I havn't looked at the code. > --mark. I'll get natd into the mainline sources by the end of the week (version 1.6). -- Brian , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....