From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 19 11:56:00 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA01072 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivory.lm.com (ivory.lm.com [192.231.221.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA01067 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:55:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from peterb@localhost) by ivory.lm.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA04056; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:55:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:55:49 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Berger X-Sender: peterb@ivory.lm.com To: "Garrett A. Wollman" cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 (or more) LAN interface on SAME subnet ? In-Reply-To: <9512191945.AA15941@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID: X-Mentos: The Freshmaker! X-Request-Do: resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Well, I'm not enlightened yet. Here's my netstat -ni and routing table. Note that I haven't figured out why tun0 is being picked up as a /16 network when I specify it as a /24 in ppp.conf and sysconfig. If I ifconfig the netmask to be correct, everything still works. I guess what I'm really asking here is "Given that I have a /24 allocated to me and routing through the netblazer, what does the "correct" solution look lie? Would I need to give the PPP link an address on 147.72.1?" peterb% netstat -ni Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll ep0 1500 00.60.8c.f2.92.2d 1 0 3 0 0 ep0 1500 147.72.56 147.72.56.1 1 0 3 0 0 lo0 16384 3 0 3 0 0 lo0 16384 127 127.0.0.1 3 0 3 0 0 ppp0* 1500 0 0 0 0 0 tun0 1500 16003 0 14913 0 0 tun0 1500 147.72 147.72.56.1 16003 0 14913 0 0 peterb% netstat -nr Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 147.72.1.2 UGc 2 0 tun0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 3 lo0 147.72 147.72.1.2 UGc 12 2 tun0 147.72.1.2 147.72.56.1 UH 6 0 tun0 147.72.56 link#1 UC 1 0 147.72.56.1 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0 224 link#1 UCS 0 0