From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov 26 13:09:52 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA19653
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Nov 1997 13:09:52 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [195.1.171.130])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA19643
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 26 Nov 1997 13:09:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
Received: (qmail 25868 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Nov 1997 21:09:41 +0000 (GMT)
To: tlambert@primenet.com
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BIND 8.1.1
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Nov 1997 20:10:29 +0000 (GMT)"
References: <199711262010.NAA14950@usr08.primenet.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.28.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 22:09:41 +0100
Message-ID: <25866.880578581@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> These statements are incompatible.  BIND 8.1.x requires integration
> into libc.

Not as long as you only want to use named/named-xfer. And that's what
a lot of people do. A port would be just fine for this.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no