From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 13 13:36:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA20411 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:36:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gjp.erols.com (alex-va-n008c243.moon.jic.com [206.156.18.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA20262 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:35:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) Received: from gjp.erols.com (localhost.erols.com [127.0.0.1]) by gjp.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA21710; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 16:35:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Tom cc: Scot Elliott , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: include libc_r in 2.2.6 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:12:01 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 16:35:31 -0500 Message-ID: <21706.889824931@gjp.erols.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Tom wrote in message ID : > No, your interpretation is flawed. No, I think you're being shortsighted > The "missing lib" is not a port, so the ports collection can't install > it. libc_r is part of 2.2.5-stable tree. Its just not compiled by > default. Ok, so in the case that libc_r is missing, you fall back to using pthreads, which the port is already using (or so I assume from other posts) Or am I missing something here? Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message