Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:01:55 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with DHCLIENT vs 64-bit time_t Message-ID: <p0602046ebc5f006a4219@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20040222192516.GC25047@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <p06020407bc533f0ae9d2@[128.113.24.47]> <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <p0602040ebc54c885236b@[128.113.24.47]> <20040215165913.M30161@grogged.dyndns.org> <p06020425bc571c20bcde@[128.113.24.47]> <p06020466bc5e09bf7182@[128.113.24.47]> <xzpznbbwfxb.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040222191618.GB53610@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20040222192516.GC25047@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2:25 PM -0500 2/22/04, Ken Smith wrote: > >Since the ISO's done I can try to take care of this if nobody else >wants to. Would be nice to have it fixed before I do the next >snapshot (right after Garance does the real commit). I'm more than happy to have other people looking into these issues. I just wanted to come up with an upgrade path to 64-bit time_t's ... I am not promising to fix every bug which results from making the change! >I'd just be trying to confirm Dag-Erling's patch works and then >running it by my mentor... Note that /usr/src/contrib/isc-dhcp is in contrib, and according to the FREEBSD-upgrade file it has been handled by: mbr@FreeBSD.org murray@FreeBSD.org obrien@NUXI.com Make sure you get explicit approval from at least one of them before you consider making any commits to it. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0602046ebc5f006a4219>