From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 3 22:51:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4933216A403; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 22:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E300B43CB9; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 22:50:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6F746C4C; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 17:51:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 22:51:22 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Remko Lodder In-Reply-To: <45732F01.6040204@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20061203223415.D69580@fledge.watson.org> References: <200612031944.kB3Ji1Ma081957@repoman.freebsd.org> <45732F01.6040204@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, Marc Fonvieille , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/share/sgml header.ent www/en/layout/css layout.css www/en index.xsl X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:51:23 -0000 On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Remko Lodder wrote: > Marc Fonvieille wrote: >> blackend 2006-12-03 19:44:01 UTC >> >> FreeBSD doc repository >> >> Modified files: >> share/sgml header.ent en/layout/css layout.css >> en index.xsl Log: >> Put the Foundation link on the top navbar. >> Requested by: rwatson >> Approved by: doceng > > Isn't this something we should discuss on www@ ? We mostly had the idea that > if something was to be added on the pages we should remove something to > refrain from getting overloaded again. That said; we still have multiple > reported issues which should be resolved prior to adding these kind of > links. > > I would like to see at least some discussion on www@ first so could you > please ponder on backing out this change till this had been discussed? Hmm. I would really prefer we keep the highly visible top-of-page link for the Foundation while the details are sorted it out, rather than removing it. The Foundation is about $140k in the red on our annual budget right now, and we're in the throes of a fundraising campaign to try to raise the funds to pay for next year's developer travel, conference sponsorshop (AsiaBSDCon, EuroBSDCon, BSDCan), developer summits, etc. I appreciate the need to go about things the right way, hence our contacting doceng to request the change in the first place, but there is a very real and concrete reason we want it on there: if we don't raise the funds, the Foundation won't be doing much in 18 months' time. Can we find a way to resolve the technical issues on the schedule they will inevitably take to resolve without reducing Foundation visibility on the front page? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge