From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 15 18:07:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B557A84805 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markhamb@corp.ssimicro.com) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.ssimicro.com", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E39A9196F for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markhamb@corp.ssimicro.com) Received: from yk-office-RESERVED-64-247-130-128.ssimicro.com (yk-office-RESERVED-64-247-130-128.ssimicro.com [64.247.130.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u0FI4JgN028502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:04:20 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: 64 bit linux binary support To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5696740B.5070404@hiwaay.net> <86si20mza9.fsf@gmail.com> <5697B6DE.6000706@hiwaay.net> <56991140.7000608@hiwaay.net> <20160115171416.GO7929@physics.umn.edu> From: markham breitbach Message-ID: <569935BB.4000305@corp.ssimicro.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:08:59 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160115171416.GO7929@physics.umn.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:07:29 -0000 This might be what you are thinking of : https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=508561+0+archive/2015/freebsd-questions/20150913.freebsd-questions "Some (if not most) has been commited to current but was too late to be included with 10.2" -M On 2016-01-15 10:14 AM, Graham Allan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:38:50AM -0553, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> Again, my original question pertained to 64-bit linux binary >> support. 32-bit is there & working (linux ABI layer), I was just >> curious about how 64-bit was/is going. > I was sure I'd seen some news about it, but the most recent I could find > was in the 2Q 2015 status report: > > https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.html#Linux-Binary-Emulation-Layer-Upgrade > > G. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"