From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 10:24:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A4C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:24:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6DF43D39 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) j1RAO4S9011450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:24:05 +1100 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])j1RAO47l096705; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:24:04 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)j1RAO4JV096704; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:24:04 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:24:04 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050227102404.GB96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20050226071308.GN57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050227032315.GA96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050227032829.GA75730@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227032829.GA75730@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Excessive delays due to syncer kthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:24:08 -0000 On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 19:28:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on >RELENG_5. Thanks for that. How about RELENG_5_3? Do I need to move to -STABLE (and traditionally, this point of the release cycle is not a good time to be running -STABLE). -- Peter Jeremy