Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:21:52 +0900 From: "Daisuke Aoyama" <aoyama@peach.ne.jp> To: "Andrei Kolu" <antik@bsd.ee>, "FreeBSD Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Tester wanted for multipath failover iSCSI target software Message-ID: <A01838D2B0434CB1950FBFCF808BD3BE@artemis> References: <E1LhM2m-000G5r-2V@dilbert.ticketswitch.com><34849EA9C0D3417C9784824CC0080090@artemis> <49B8BE06.1010105@bsd.ee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Thank you for reporting. >I have tested "net/istgt" for couple of days with Windows XP and it >works more reliable than NetBSD "net/iscsi-target". >With NetBSD implementation sometimes I lost partition filesystem >information after disconnecting server from network or rebooting my >computer. Yes, it is one of differences. istgt reports connected information such as SCSI port to the initiator for discriminating multipath and failover path. As a side effect, perhaps more accurate identification is possible. >Is there any particular testcases you want to perform? If you use it as usual, it is tested enough. If I had to say, I want to know how much a CPU usage on the target machine. Because istgt is more complicated than iscsi-target. >Tested on FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 11 22:29:33 EET 2009 Did you use the target with ZFS? or UFS? Did you use MCS feature? Thanks, -- Daisuke Aoyama
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A01838D2B0434CB1950FBFCF808BD3BE>