From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 07:53:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE83216A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D184F43D79
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:53:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net)
Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1Ah9o6-000IGv-MA; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100
From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org>
To: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
Message-ID: <20040115155318.GR2221@voodoo.oberon.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org>,
	John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon
Sender: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:53:55 -0000


--QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:50:49AM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.
>=20
>   Read the users email.  They're using specific tags, not "." so there are
> (or may be) some differences as time elapses.

Users should not use tags for ports collection. It's
documentated also.

-Kirill

--QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFABrduQC1G6a60JuURApeKAKDPOSNMKy/nP0gOkTBbnkbHb6vp6gCgujuZ
lQUGibx0GcpMYCFvnJIeDA8=
=M7/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc--