Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:29:00 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jail source address selection broken, patch for ping Message-ID: <4C505F2B-BB87-46EE-AEDF-549B0F0F4720@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <op.wcik10bo34t2sn@tech304> References: <493438014.49159.1333999007132.JavaMail.root@mrelmx09.mrec.ar> <op.wcik10bo34t2sn@tech304>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9. Apr 2012, at 20:11 , Mark Felder wrote: > On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:16:47 -0500, Juan F. D=EDaz y D=EDaz = <jfd@mrecic.gov.ar> wrote: >=20 >> Mark, you can just run a jail with the setfib utility so you don't = need to modify all your scripts. >=20 > I don't think anyone here is understanding the issue and forcing a = routing table will not help. yeah you would need a dedicated FIB per VLAN and then still have the = problem that a single program like fping would try to reach a node in = each VLAN and would have to switch FIBs in between and everything; that = would require more patching of code. It would be different if it was a = VLAN per jail in which case you'd probably not have the problem in first = place;) /bz --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C505F2B-BB87-46EE-AEDF-549B0F0F4720>