From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Feb 21 13:08:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1429AAF86F for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27511DCC for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1LD8T1C013132 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:08:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206335] clang++ -x c++ issue : expected unqualified-id Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:08:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: hubertus21@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:08:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206335 --- Comment #3 from Hubert Drogosz --- It seems to me that it isn't a bug. For me clang does what it should do.=20 Taking from clang man page: -x Treat subsequent input files as having type language. So for me it means that it should treat every file after -x option as file = of this type. As you're passing object file (test-function.o) after -x c++ option, it tri= es to interpret this file like c++ source file, and it fails.=20 I think you should compile it this way: clang++ -o test-x_cpp test-function.o -x c++ test-x_cpp.c Unfortunately, there isn't an option to pass object file after using -x opt= ion, so object files should be passed before using any -x option. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=