From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 30 02:51:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7E816A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:51:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236E743D60
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:51:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id 0BA0F5309; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:51:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id 4632B5308; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:51:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id D40E833CAA; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:51:29 +0200 (CEST)
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
References: <20040328182314.GA99956@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpisgmwurw.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040330093548.GA46139@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpvfkmvdew.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:51:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru> (Andrey Chernov's message
 of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:31:19 +0400")
Message-ID: <xzpr7vavc9a.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: mtree -L is broken due to unneded type=link additions to
 BSD.*.dist
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:51:37 -0000

Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes:
> I am not sure I understand situation you describe. As I see, there is a
> step in bsd.port.mk when directories are created (and symlinks we discuss
> too, just few lines later). Even with your patch, they will be created in
> exact the same place in bsd.port.mk - i.e. I see no difference in
> before/after installing the port situation with your patch or without it.
> Please explain the difference.

People use scripts to create empty directory structures so they can
compare before / after file lists to generate plists.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no