From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri May  9 21:58:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA18064
          for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 May 1997 21:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA18055
          for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 9 May 1997 21:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id OAA05467; Sat, 10 May 1997 14:48:24 +1000
Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 14:48:24 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199705100448.OAA05467@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au, jin@george.lbl.gov
Subject: Re: gnu/3554
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Err, look again. :) Not to mention that 1,000 other typos that can
>otherwise go unnoticed when not using -Wall. Everyone develops
>code using -Wall, don't they? If not, why not? I don't know how
>many times -Wall has caught things like this in one way or another
>for me.

You mean that everyone develops code using

	-W -Wall -ansi -pedantic -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align \
	-Wcast-qual -Wchar-subscripts -Wconversion -Winline \
	-Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith \
	-Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings

don't they? :-)

Bruce