From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov  5 08:30:28 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A4016A417
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 Nov 2007 08:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47E813C4AA
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 Nov 2007 08:30:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost)
	by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id TAA20693;
	Mon, 5 Nov 2007 19:30:03 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 19:30:01 +1100 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071105052148.8A95916A417@hub.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1071105190713.11481M-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Juri Mianovich <juri_mian@yahoo.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipfw rule question ... all possible interfaces ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:30:28 -0000

On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 00:22:00 +0000 RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> wrote:
 > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:10:12 -0800 (PST)
 > Juri Mianovich <juri_mian@yahoo.com> wrote:
 > 
 > > 
 > > Is there a way to tell ipfw:
 > > 
 > > "all interfaces currently configured on this system" ?
 > > 
 > >...
 > > 
 > > So if I have a rule like:
 > > 
 > > allow ip from any to any via iwi0
 > >
 > 
 > You don't have to use "via" in a rule.

That's true, though you can also specify 'via any'.  Whether either is
actually a good idea for the case in question may be another matter .. 

Cheers, Ian