From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 18 21:31:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF0A1065740 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08AB28FC0C for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2012 21:31:42 -0000 Received: from f055244009.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO mandree.no-ip.org) [78.55.244.9] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 18 Sep 2012 23:31:42 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+zEh0pteOzJmCLa2XLBrSxLUL4++bJwvvq/VXF+5 pRtiTlfYfU/aeE Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A596C23CF2B for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:31:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5058E83C.4070806@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:31:40 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <5057765F.4080001@an3e.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Providing a default graphical environment on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:31:44 -0000 Am 17.09.2012 21:52, schrieb Lorenzo Cogotti: > Even the userbase/time spent developing ratio matters. What also matters > is the interest that a system shows in something, I think it's obvious > that FreeBSD can't get much attention as a desktop system if no effort > is put into it. It is not a bad thing being tied to the server concept, > but I just think FreeBSD would also be an excellent desktop system with > a little effort. There is Debian/kFreeBSD - Debian on a FreeBSD kernel. Not sure how useful it is, and it probably lacks FreeBSD's userland, but well, just a point.