From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 16:46:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49EC16A420 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:46:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D93443D80 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 29651 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 16:46:22 -0000 Received: from maxwell2.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.192) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 16:46:21 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.246.118]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20060201164621.BVOL28656.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:46:21 +0800 Message-ID: <43E0E55F.2080908@pacific.net.sg> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:44:15 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <43E0E23C.6060908@pacific.net.sg> <43E0E521.5010302@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <43E0E521.5010302@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Segmentation Fault in OpenOffice after upgrading to 2.0.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:46:33 -0000 Hi, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Erich Dollansky wrote: >> I posted this just by mistake to ports. >> >> What is the difference between ports and freebsd-ports? > > There is no difference; they are two names or aliases for the same list. Thanks. It was just confusing after I saw that I posted in the 'wrong' list. > > [ ...problem with OO 2.0->2.01... ] >> The portstree was a few minutes old when I started the process. >> >> Is this a known problem? >> >> What can I do to pin it down? > > Lack of data. It would help to run the program under gdb, or look at the > backtrace if you've got a coredump available. Perhaps you should re-update your > ports and verify that all dependencies have been rebuilt. > So, it is just on my machine. I will do this tomorrow as it is here already pretty late. Erich