From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 16 10:53:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5BE16A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:53:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E8F43D39 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:53:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from gicco.homeip.net (80-218-73-163.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.218.73.163])i7GArdOj019174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:53:40 +0200 Received: from localhost.here (idefix@gicco.homeip.net [127.0.0.1]) by gicco.homeip.net (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7GArdNv001118 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:53:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: (from idefix@localhost) by localhost.here (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id i7GArdfE001117 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:53:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.here: idefix set sender to hampi@rootshell.be using -f Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:53:39 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040816105339.GA1056@gicco.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040815160407.GA941@gicco.homeip.net> <20040815172327.350e31e0.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040815172327.350e31e0.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: kernel module configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:53:41 -0000 On Aug 15 at 17:23, Bill Moran spoke: > By the config file. If you enable the module in the config, it is > built into the kernel, otherwise a kld is generated. What about `apm'? Is it sufficcient to have it commented out in the config and set hint.apm.0.disabled=0 and boot with ACPI disabled? Or should I compile a kernel with `device apm'? Or should I load apm.ko somewhere? (When I try apm the boot process crashes very early and drops into the debugger.) -Hanspeter