From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar 15 21:08:13 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA00447 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 21:08:13 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAB00441 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 21:08:12 -0800
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id VAA10012 for hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 21:08:12 -0800
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199503160508.VAA10012@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: fsck buglet
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 21:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 373       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


If I say "fsck -n /dev/rfd0", wouldn't it make sense for fsck to return
a non-zero exit code if any trouble were found ?

As it is it will return zero no matter what it finds...

Any takers ?
-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'