From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 5 3:17:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6684037B401; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:17:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2819E43E4A; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:17:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id E958DAE28A; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:17:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:17:24 -0800 From: Maxime Henrion To: Juli Mallett Cc: Patrick Hartling , current@freebsd.org, marcel@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe Message-ID: <20021105111724.GF26605@elvis.mu.org> References: <3DC71B56.1050102@137.org> <20021105105813.GD26605@elvis.mu.org> <20021105105927.GE26605@elvis.mu.org> <20021105030419.A19427@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021105030419.A19427@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Maxime Henrion [ Data: 2002-11-05 ] > [ Subjecte: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe ] > > Maxime Henrion wrote: > > > Patrick Hartling wrote: > > > > I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions into use in some > > > > C++ code, but linking fails because the function prototypes in uuid.h > > > > are not protected with the __cplusplus/extern "C" bits. It's easy > > > > enough for me to fix my local copy, but I'm sure this same thing could > > > > trip up other people. > > > > > > This should be fixed with the attached patch. Marcel, can you review > > > and commit it please ? > > Oops, I probably should have pinged Marcel about this, now that I think > about it, but anyway, it shouldn't change anything. Even with vanilla > cpp(1) both produce the right thing, with or without __cplusplus defined, > and both produce the identical thing (moins linenos/whitespace) in the > C case. > > Of course, both and needed changed, as both > define protos, and is included into . That's arguably bad, sys/uuid.h shouldn't have any !_KERNEL prototypes in it. Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message